商会演讲稿(2篇范文)

第1篇 美国副总统拜登5月5日在美中商会早餐会英语演讲稿

(applause.) thank you very much. and i’m so late you probably thought you weregoing tohear from the 48th vice president of the united states. (laughter.) i apologize. i always,when i’mlate at home, always blame it on the president. but i can’t do that today, and iapologize for keeping you waiting.

i remember 220 years ago, when iwas in college, you only had to wait 10 minutes for aprofessor, 20 minutes fora full professor. the only fullprofessor in the biden family is my wife --you didn’t have to wait thislong. but thank you so much for givingme the opportunity to speakwith you all.

let me begin by saying one thingabout competition. i’ve told this tovice president xi andthen president xi, in all the time i had to spend withhim, is that one of the things that hashappened in the last 20 years, as theworld has become more competitive, it’s awakened thecompetitive spirit in theunited states. competition is stampedinto our dna. and if there’sanythingremotely approaching a level playing field, we’ll do just fine -- just fine.

and so i want to thank theamerican chamber of commerce and the u.s. business councilfor inviting me heretoday. you are living the u.s.-chinarelationship every single day, and youknow the opportunities, but you alsoknow the obstacles. and it’s great to beback together onelast time here in beijing with our ambassador, garylocke. i say one last time because heisgoing to be heading back to his home state of washington after a verydistinguished career,which i don’t think is anywhere near ended, as bothgovernor, member of the cabinet, as well asthe ambassador.

and gary and i were speaking thismorning as i was -- there was a telephone call, they saidi’m requiredupstairs. and one of the things i likeabout gary -- there’s no member of -- nogovernor or member of cabinet that ihave enjoyed working with more, because gary speaksenglish. by that, i mean not english versus chinese; imean plain versus complicated. (laughter.) and so when gary speaks, everyone understandsexactly what he means.

and as you know better than i,communication is the currency, and particularly thecurrency that is neededmost here in china. he’s been anambassador to the chinesegovernment, but also to the chinese people, and hewill be missed. i remember, i washereshortly after gary arrived and every newspaper you’d pick, even though i don’treadchinese, i’d see gary’s picture -- because he connected. he connected immediately with thechinesepeople as a representative of our country and knowing -- the chinese peopleknowinghe was reaching out not just to the government, but to them.

i had a chance since i’ve beenhere -- it’s been a very rapid visit, and it’s been 14-hour days,but veryuseful -- i had a chance to talk with vice president li, and i will spendseveral hours --and i spent i guess almost four and a half hours withpresident xi. and i’m honored thathewould give me the time to go into such detail, both in a private bilat with himas well as anexpanded, as well as a lovely dinner he hosted for me and a fewof my colleagues. later, i’ll bemeetingwith premier li.

and i want to talk to you aboutmuch of what -- some of what i’ve talked to all of themabout and what ibelieve to be are next steps in the u.s.-china relationship.

we’re trying to build a new kindof relationship between major powers, one that’s different,one that is definedby constructive cooperation, healthy competition, and a shared respectfor anagreed upon new set of rules of the road and international norms for the 21stcentury.

after world ii, our grandfathersand fathers and mothers put in place a structure thataccommodated the economicchange that took place in the world and set up a new set of rules ofthe roadfor the remainder of the 20th century. we’re in a different place now. you all know itbetter than i do. we use the phrase in colloquial conversation in all our countries thatit’s a“global economy.” but it’s trulya global economy -- a global economy.

my colleagues always kid me aboutquoting irish poets all the time. theythink i do itbecause i’m irish. i do itbecause they’re the best poets. (laughter.) and william butleryeatswrote a poem called easter sunday 1916, about the first rising in irelandin the 20th century.and he had a linein it that better describes, i would argue, the pacific basin in the year2019than it did in his ireland in 1916. hesaid, “all is changed, changed utterly, a terriblebeauty has been born.”

we’re at a moment, a window, asthey say, of opportunity. how long itwill remain openremains to be seen -- where we can potentially establish a setof rules of the road that providefor mutual benefit and growth of both ourcountries and the region, that set down sort of thetracks for progress in the21st century. i think it is thatprofound. i think that’s the place,that’sthe inflection point we are at in our relationship now -- not only with chinabut the entireregion.

and so the only path to realizingthis vision for the future is through tangible, practicalcooperation andmanaging our differences effectively. we’venot tried this before. we’ve nottriedthis before. this is going to bedifficult. but if we get it right, theoutcome for our childrenand grandchildren can be profound -- profoundlypositive.

but to move this relationshipforward, there is no substitute for direct and personalengagement betweenleaders. president xi pointed out to me,because i had an opportunitywhen he was vice president to spend someconsiderable time with him at the request ofpresident hu and then -- andpresident obama. he made indirectreference to -- there was afamous american politician named tip o’neill, who iadmired a great deal and was sort of amentor when i was a young 29-year-oldsenator coming into congress. and he’sfamous forhaving said all politics is local. well, i believe all politics is personal, includinginternationalpolitics.

personal relationships are theonly vehicle by which you build trust. it doesn’t mean youagree, but trust to know that the man or woman onthe other side of the table is telling youprecisely what they mean, even ifyou don’t want to hear it. that’s whypresident obama askedme to make this visit, and that’s why president xi and ispent so much time together yesterdaydiscussing in great detail a whole rangeof issues we face together that are difficult for both of usto navigate in ourown political system.

these were very candidconversations. i know it shocks you tothink i would be candid. iknow that’s ashocking assertion. no one has doubted that i mean exactly what i say. theproblem is i sometimes tend to say allthat i mean. (laughter.) but because our relationship isso complex,getting it right isn’t going to be easy, and it’s going to require directstraightforwardnesswith one another about our interests, our concerns and, quite frankly,ourexpectations. and that was the nature ofthe discussion yesterday.

let me start with economics, notbecause this is a business audience, but becauseultimately what matters moston both sides is our ability to deliver better for our peoplewithout it beingviewed as a zero-sum game. i have saidsince i met with deng xiaoping as ayoung senator, with very senior senators, thatchina’s economic growth is very much in theinterest of the united states ofamerica -- very much in our interest. inmy meetings withpresident xi, he and i spent a good deal of our timediscussing the outcomes of china’s thirdplenum. china’s leaders have stated their ambition tomove china toward a system where themarket plays a “decisive role.” that is a very, very big order that willrequire on the part of --and i’m confident he possesses it -- the leadershipof this country and the president.

but, in fact, many of the reformschina’s leaders are proposing actually match the prioritieswe have raised withchina over the years. leveling theplaying field for private and foreign-ownedcompanies -- it’s going to be adifficult, difficult transition. protecting intellectual propertyand trade secrets, which isessential. it’s not a surprise that anumber of american companies arecoming home in their manufacturing. why? well, we have very productive workers, but alsowe have court systemsthat are totally transparent. intellectual property is protected. itmatters. and i think it’sbecoming apparent to our competitors around the world that itmatters for theirown economic growth. opening servicesectors to private and foreigninvestment and moving to market -- to amarket-demand exchange rate.

these are welcome steps, but theywill be difficult steps, and there’s no need to wait till2020. again, the chinese leadership in private hasbeen very candid with me about thedifficulty, but the determination they haveto meet this, by any standard, very ambitiousgoal. of course, what matters most at the end ofthe day will be implementation. there’san oldsaxon expression -- the proof of the pudding is in the eating. the proof of the pudding is intheeating. but i have no doubt thatpresident xi and his leadership and his primary advisorsintend on, mean to,are committed to making the third plenum a reality. but it is going torequiresubstantial commitment and follow-through.

reform anywhere ischallenging. there are always intenseinterests. i know you all are sohappyabout our views on wall street reform -- not easy, but a minor -- a minor --changecompared to what the chinese leadership has taken on. but the more china delivers on itsproposedreforms the strong our bilateral trade and investment relationship will be.

and there’s a lot of work to do,and i know that many of you have concerns that need to bedealt with in theprocess. there are a number of areaswhere, in the next two years, we can andshould make progress immediately. we have an opportunity to improveintellectual propertyprotection, resolve outstanding trade disputes that areholding us back. we have anopportunityto significantly expand our cooperation on energy and climate change -- wherewehave overwhelmingly mutual interest. helping china achieve new vehicle emissionstandards andenergy-transparent goals is that we committed to this week.

implementing our agreement onhfcs -- we have an opportunity to protect the healthand well-being of ourpeople by increasing the safety of food and drugs. and today we’ve agreedon increase of thenumber of u.s. inspectors who are operating in china.

we have an opportunity in themonths ahead to make significant progress in negotiating abid, a bilateral investmenttreaty and much more.

the third plenum also speaks tosocial and political reform and identifies some importantnear-term steps thatthey want to implement -- an end to china’s program of reeducationthroughforced labor, easing the one-child policy, a commitment to deeper judicial andlegalreforms. any major economic powerin the 21st century, these are all going to become essentialrequirements inorder to sustain growth, in my humble opinion, through the first half ofthe21st century.

as was pointed out yesterday bythe president, quoting back to me, i always say i never tellanother man hisbusiness, or suggest to another leader what’s in the interests of his country.butthe interests laid out in the third plenum seem to be very much in ourmutual interest. thereare many moresteps china can take to open its politics and society as well as itseconomy. andas i’ve said before, thisis actually, from our perspective, in china’s interest, notwithstandingit’sfor them to determine their interest. because history tells us that innovation is thecurrency of 21st centurysuccess. innovation thrive where peoplebreathe freely, speak freely,are able to challenge orthodoxy, where newspaperscan report the truth without fear ofconsequences.

we have many disagreements, andsome profound disagreements, on some of those issuesright now, in thetreatment of u.s. journalists. but ibelieve china will be stronger and morestable and more innovative if it respectsuniversal human rights.

i was asked why we always talkabout human rights. the point i try tomake wherever i go inthe world when that discussion comes up is we are anation of immigrants. the vast majorityofyour ancestors who came to america came because their human rights werebeing violated. it isstamped into thedna of americans. no president, nomatter how much he or she would like toavoid speaking to it, is able to remainsilent without suffering consequences from the americanpublic. it is who we are. not that we’re the citadel of human rights;we have much progress tomake ourselves.

as businesses know well,prosperity critically depends upon predictability and stability.the united states and our allies haveguaranteed peace and security in this region for morethan 60 years, providingthe conditions for the remarkable economic progress in the region,particularlychina. our relationship with china iscomplex, though. we have our differencesandthey are real. but there’s nothinginevitable about a conflict with china -- nothing inevitableabout a conflictwith china. wholesome competition andstrong competition is fundamentallydifferent than conflict.

in fact, we see considerablecommon interest on the security side. asecure and peacefulasia pacific enables economic growth for the entireregion. this area of the world is goingto bethe economic engine of the 21st century; in halting the spread of weaponsof massdestruction, including north korea, to stabilizing nuclear missileprogram, where we have realcooperation; in greater access to affordable andclean sources of energy. it’s easier tobegin totalk about that in the united states and in china because as -- mypresident kids me -- i oftensay reality has a way of intruding. reality has a way of intruding. and it has intruded in bothour countries interms of global warming and the effects on air quality -- storms,naturaldisasters. and it is overwhelmingly inour mutual interest that we share the capacityeach of us may have to deal witha more healthy environment.

we need to keep buildingpractical cooperation and manage areas where we do not seeeye-to-eye. everybody focuses on where we disagree withthe chinese. we disagree with ouralliesin other parts of the world. but china’srecent and sudden announcement of theestablishment of a new air defenseidentification zone has, to state the obvious, causedsignificant apprehensionin the region.

and i was very direct about ourfirm position and our expectations in my conversations withpresident xi. but i also put this in a broadercontext. the asia pacific region will bethe driver ofthe global economy, to repeat myself, in the 21st century, and aschina’s economy grows, itsstake in regional peace and stability will continueto grow as well because it has so much moreto lose. that’s why china will bear increasingresponsibility to contribute positively to peace andsecurity.

that means taking steps to reducethe risk of accidental conflict and miscalculation, andreaffirming -- reaffirmingthat we want to have better predictability and refraining from takingstepsthat will increase tension. and it meanspursuing -- this means pursuing crisismanagement mechanisms and effectivechannels for communications with its neighbors.

these are some of the things idiscussed with chinese leaders. theunited states has aprofound stake in what happens here because we need, and weare, and will remain a pacificpower diplomatically, economically, and militarily. that’s just a statement of fact.

when i first visited china backin 1979, as has been pointed out, i came to the conclusionthen that i stillshare now, that china’s economic growth then i thought would be good for,andnow i am confident is good for america and the world. but it has never been inevitable. ittakes work to build trust and make a habitout of cooperation, to be clear, predictable andstraight with one another whenwe disagree, and to escape the traps that set other powersbefore us down apath of conflict.

that is the work of leaders anddiplomats, but it is also of citizens and businesspeople like allof youassembled before me. i believe that our success or failure in building au.s.-chinarelationship that will define the world for our grandchildren tolive in depends not just onpolitical leaders, but on you as well. i believe that the shared prosperity that youhelp create ispart of the glue that will hold together this relationship. so i thank you. i thank you for yourcommitment. i thank you for your hard work. i thank you for staying in the game. and i wishyou all a great deal of luckbecause your success strengthens the entire relationship.

and if we get this relationshipright, together china and america, the region and the worldwill be better offfor it for a long time to come, and that is not hyperbole. that is -- as an oldwestern movie used tosay in america, that ain’t brag, ma’am. that’s just fact. it is a fact thatif we get this right theprospects for the 21st century being peaceful, secure and everyonesharing in thegrowing prosperity is real.

so thank you all for what youdo. and may god bless you all and maygod protect ourtroops. thank you verymuch. appreciate you. (applause.)

第2篇 上海市浙江商会年会上的励志演讲稿

20xx年我们坚持再活过去!

演讲时间：20xx年12月30日

——马云在上海市浙江商会年会上的励志演讲稿

大家下午好!坐在那儿本来我不想发言，广昌说你来了，一定得跟大家分享、交流一下。因为我坐在下面，应该讲受益匪浅，听了经济学家的讲座，听了各位的交流。因为从经济学家开始，我还得说几句经济学家的问题。

其实这一年大家活得都不容易。但不管怎么说，我们都活下来了，年底这么忙，大家可以在这儿花一个下午，说明我们都过来了。商场如战场，战场上活着的人，是成功的，企业也一样。战场上，商场上年底还能站在那儿听讲座，还能交流，还能发奖金、工资，那就是不错。做企业的第一要素，就是不死，跟战士一样，上战场的第一要素，有时候不是为了赢，而是活着。

20xx年最后一天，我们都没倒下，这是非常值得庆贺的!

我们每年都把未来的一年想得非常艰难。尽管我知道，第二年肯定有很多人做得比我们好，未必我们公司能做得更好，我们公司可能会有很多不可预期的困难出现，看清楚未来的灾难，仍旧为之，这才是真正的乐观。所以我觉得我们做企业，脚踏实地，其实来的3到5年经济情况并不容乐观，但是未来5到15年左右，中国的经济还是很有机会的。

在经济好的时候赚钱的企业家，不能称之为真正的企业家。股市是牛市的时候，街上买菜的老太太都能赚钱，你不能把自己称之为投资者，只能称之为炒股者。经济不好，你才是优秀的企业。好企业，基本上经历过几个悲惨的经历，或者是自己的原因，或者是经济的原因造成的，所以我觉得，在危**头，能熬过去的企业才有“抗体”。

最近也听了很多经济学家讲，在短期以内中国经济有下滑压力。我个人认为，中国经济下滑压力，是长期的，是持久的，是永远性的。我们不可能回到9%、12%。我们要学习适应5、6%，甚至在未来20年，我们能保持2%-4%，已经很了不起了。因为我们已经是世界上第二大经济体。你继续保持15%的增长，这是要出问题的，到1.78，不太会长了，要的是脑袋，国家体制、机制，这也是一个科学，所以不是短期有压力，而是长期我们学会有2%到4%，其实2%、4%，已经非常了不起了。即使2%、4%，有企业依旧能达到200%、300%的成长，有的企业再好的经济形势，也做不好。其实经济形势好坏，与你自己做得好坏没有多大关系。所以，不要因为说你的企业做得不好，你就“归功于”经济不好，经济不好也有好企业，经济好的时候，不好的企业有的是。

总体来讲，过去的一年中国还是有很多有意思的事情，二胎开放了，人民币进了篮子，20xx年其实很不简单，很多事情我这辈子可能看不见，都发生了。但是我们企业家就是要把握那些可能超越我们期望和预判的东西，我自己有时候想，人家现在把阿里巴巴看得挺神，其实阿里巴巴就是一个很普通的公司。16年以前，我们说出要成为世界十大网站之一，那个时候我们公司排名可能200万名以外，说这句话很狂妄，但是稀里糊涂地居然做到了这个目标。这不是因为我们多厉害，而是我们处在一个很有意思的独特的时代。这不是虚话，我们确实感谢这个国家，感谢整个改革开放，我们确实感谢互联网，感谢所有年轻人。没有这些，阿里巴巴所有的梦想，真是一个空想。

今天全世界变化最大的国家，可能就是中国。正在经历着巨大的变革，转型也好、升级也好、创新也好，各种各样的变革，都非常之大。特别是作为第二大经济体，中国现在在座所有的企业家我们拥有的机会，可能是人类社会在一个时代极其罕见的。我们是第二大经济体，但是企业的质量、数量、规模、品质，跟第一大经济体美国比，欧盟比，欧洲比，跟日本比，还相当非常之大。今天，我们能够参加“世界杯足球赛”的中国国家企业队，其实就像中国足球队一样，我们能进去，也是检漏进去，我们实力远远不足。但是作为第二大经济体，未来一定会诞生很多世界级的企业。

中国过去30年的改革开放，请问中国有多少企业活过了30年?而要想成为一个持久的经济体，大概需要50年，很多企业只有跨国50年的历程，这50年历程内至少有5到10次灾难，是经历了国家、国际形势和企业内部的灾难，才能称之为一个坚强的企业。任何一次打击，对我们来讲都是一次机遇。

大家今天讲得最多的就是创新，中国这个时代也是千年不遇。几千年来有哪个国家、哪个时代真正消灭贫困?但是我们这代人正在努力实现。互联网是一场前所未有的技术革命，我们是否能把握、掌握?

作为一个优秀的企业，我们要理解这个时代，要读懂这个国家，我们企业家只有真正了解自己有什么、要什么、放弃什么，你企业才会走得久。刚才周会长一番话，我听下来觉得周会长在反思自己有什么、要什么以及学会放弃什么。我们的知识越多，知道自己要什么，但是缺乏智慧，因为智慧告诉你什么我们是不要的。

这这也是一个真正的商业变革的时代，商业变革，每个人对机会的判断是不一样的，有的人把这个机会看作机会，灾难，有人把灾难看成机会，有人把好好的机会做成了灾难，而很多人又把灾难做成机会。其实机会在没有形成机会的时候，才是真正的机会，形成机会以后，往往是灾难的开始。所以今天的雾霾，已经形成了雾霾，抱怨有什么用呢?这时候是我们做企业巨大的机会，如果你改变了这个雾霾的现状，改变了中国的环境，你有可能是未来30年最了不起的企业。创新，企业家的职责是创新，创新的主角是企业家，企业家是社会发展过程中的科学家，企业家是稀缺资源，我们可以培养职业经理人，但是不可能培养企业家。所以这一点希望大家记住，我们企业家就是野生动物，我们就是原生态。我们对很多问题的反思和思考，是跟别人不一样的，所以我们对创新的理解，也是不一样的，创新不是讲故事。如果你觉得靠概念可以成功，那么你最后得到的，还是一个概念，如果你觉得讲故事能成功，最后你剩下的，只是一个故事而已。

大家要记住，创新是逼出来的，没有人是在顺利的情况下可以做好创新。创新是要付出巨大代价的，刚才王新奎教授讲的我非常同意，企业家是个状态，创新是有个时间的。马云的创新，可能就三年五年，但是创新付出巨大的代价、压力，是超过想象的。创新时间有限，如果你在乎许多外界的东西，就会失去人生中最宝贵的那一刻。65岁，你只能在自己家里做一些儿孙满堂的创新了。

创新也是有巨大风险的。传统银行机构在风险处理上比我们互联网创新要做得好。其实我们看问题的角度不一样，传统金融可能做的风险是把防弹衣做得越来越厚，越来越好，而我们的创新是让杀手根本不可能靠拢你。我们想的是完全不同的风格，你是把防弹衣做得更强还是让杀手没有可能出现在这个场地上?思考的深度广度，都是我们值得创新、反思的地方。

我们企业家一定要想明白另外一些问题，就是到底什么是成功?我个人也讲点哲学的，成，我们有时候讲，成在自己，功在后代。如果没有把功传给别人、社会、传承下去，让你的员工、客户、家人、所有认识的年轻人能得到那个功，你并不是很成功。

中国最怕的就是“首fu”，有好几种富，一种是富有的富，中国当首富是个灾难，应该是负责任的负。还有就是负债最多的负，我们也不少，但是我希望是首福，福气最好的人，有安稳的结局，千百年来做企业做得大的多少人有好的结局?我们不能解决我们的生存，出身在哪里，但是可以决定我们怎么死，企业更是如此。我们要为自己的企业、自己的员工、自己的后代找到一个很安稳、平稳的福气，只有你的家人、企业、员工、客户都得到好的、圆满的结局，这才是我们要的首福，福气的福，可能来得更好。

做企业，我们现在不知道什么时候开始，中国的企业开始学会了埋怨。其实真正的企业家，是不埋怨的，做成功的人，永远在检查自己的问题。台上的嘉宾都是在讲，我反思我过去的一年，但是不成功的人总是在怪别人，实体怪虚拟，都是别人没有做好，事实上是不是这样?其实实体经济也好，虚拟经济也好，今天都是个婴幼儿，两个孩子打架，都说对方不好。其实任何一个企业，我们永远面临着未来的挑战，我们永远面临着被别人淘汰，或者被自己淘汰。刚才讲过剩产业，中国有过剩能力吗?没有，是落后经济的能力过剩。中国制造业下滑了吗?制造业下滑，制造业从来没有下滑，世界上有苹果、特斯拉，是那些创新的，中国零售行业做得不好吗?零售行业做得很好，是你的零售行业做得不好。20年以前，你怎么把那些小商小贩、国有体制的那些落后、不能引领把握掌握未来的消费需求的商场给灭掉?你活了20年，这20年，你专注在房地产，没有专注在客户体验上，今天互联网把你给淘汰了，也是天经地义，因为互联网企业也一样，没有几家企业真正能活好三到五年，如果真正看一下，互联网企业的死亡率比传统企业好不到哪去，甚至更为残酷。

我们今天看到这些问题，也是我们的机会。中国经济不管怎么调整，不管浙商企业会面临多大的挑战，，有一点是肯定的：如果我们浙商群体过不了，中国没有一个商帮过得了，如果我们跨不过，谁能跨得过?中国几个商帮每年会有一天聚在一起，学习讨论半天时间?有多少商会能这么组织起来，这么研究和学习，反思自己、学习别人?我们做不好，谁能做得好?所以我们对自己，还是要有信心。

都说我们浙商的鼻子很灵，哪儿有商机，哪儿就有浙商。世界上任何一个角落，有可口可乐的地方，就一定有浙商，没有浙商的地方，好像没有可口可乐。所以浙商今后不仅要擅长于发现需求，我们还要创造需求，不仅要善于追赶需求，我们要引领需求，我们不仅仅要找到外在的需求，更要发掘内在的需求。所以，我觉得我们浙商未来最大的机会，在于整个国家就是品质的提升，消费品质的提升。我认为马云很难复制，因为我自己也复制不了，也不知道怎么走到今天了，没想过，从没想过自己会做企业，走到今天，是纯粹的巧合、偶然。但是很多以为自己能复制，麻烦就大了。你只能超越，不能复制。而且规模、速度并不决定你多成功，决定你成功的，不是你多大多快，而你多好、多有舒适感。中国经济一样，7%、9%，不重要，中国经济什么样的比例最舒适，这是最重要的。只有舒适度，才是最好的。有舒适度，你不会有这种压力，会调整自己。企业也一样，不要看到别人有30%的增长的一天，别人也有负30%增长的一天，只有把自己做好。

工匠精神，经济速度放缓，有什么不好?我最想不明白，其实水平好坏，在于慢速度，而不在于快速度。在快的过程中，一定会出错。如果你想快，又想慢，因为我们这个年龄的人要懂得放慢脚步，要懂得建立机制，要懂得用最好的人，最好的管理方式，最好的技术来提升创造最好的产品，而让年轻人去提升速度，不要跟年轻人比速度，也不要跟年轻人比技术和产品的创新。

最后，我也想提醒大家，20xx年并不好过。过好了，你就当马云说错了，过得不好，你要相信，其实大家过得都不好，挑战只会越来越大。互联网对大家的冲击，是远远超过你们在座所想象的。组织的变革、人才的变革、文化的变革、技术的变革，刚刚开始。

所以预祝大家20xx年不是活得好，而是20xx年我们坚持再活过去!因为阳光总是在那儿，希望能够照到我们身上。

谢谢大家!